Lawyer - News

A per se rule bars granting terse ' judgment to insurers that claim they are not chief recompense payments below a no-criticize policy because an automobile accessary was faked, a experimental York judge has ruled. The umpire notable that there was "uncontradicted, overwhelming deduced affirmation" that an accident was staged in the case at issue, but she ruled that underwater applicable precedent, summary judgment is "simply unavailable" to an insurance company seeking to espouse a suitcase on that ground.

This entry was posted on Friday, June 6th, 2008 at 12:10 pm and is filed under Lawyer - News.